cdenham wrote in New Candidate: Silliest Auction Price of the Year:I’ll just leave this bargain here
grubbiv wrote in New Candidate: Silliest Auction Price of the Year:I like it when the seller leaves off a few zeroes but those errors seem to be rare.
aia wrote in New Candidate: Silliest Auction Price of the Year:Why 2017? ...did anything happened in that year which is relevant in the collector's market?
Sir Kill Alot wrote in New Candidate: Silliest Auction Price of the Year:(Small print: no chance in hell I'm selling it)
FoulFoot wrote in New Candidate: Silliest Auction Price of the Year:You say that, but... I bet if you listen very closely, you can hear it whispering to you right now.Foul
SEALED! NEW! NEVER OPENED!!! I was told this is the only sealed one in the world.
dbartman wrote in New Candidate: Silliest Auction Price of the Year:It looks like this might have sold: ** expired/removed eBay auction **The seller made this statement in the description:It's quite annoying when sellers act like they know what they are talking about, or make spurious claims without validating them. In this case the seller says someone else "told" him this so it must be right! There are quite a few of these in SW, as I've owned two of them myself, and know others that have it in SW too.It looks like someone ended up buying it too, which is scary if they weren't aware that this item is not that rare.