nevcoup wrote:Excellent! I would like to thank all of those who coordinated this great opportunity. I recall much bickering and arguing over the size of the list and, in the end, debate over peoples' rationales for exiting the list. Nothing short of a stellar, calm, and professional job by the ACAEUM coordinators.You managed to keep "most of the members mostly happy" and that is an accomplishment in itself!
Badmike wrote:We drank a lot.Mike B.
benjoshua wrote:Gus Landt, Rakeesh sah Tarna, and deimos3428 stated they only wanted the print to help with maintaining the print count. The committee did not want anyone buying a print when they really didn't want one.
Gus Landt wrote:For me, it was more about not wanting it enough to prevent someone else who wanted one from getting one. Since there are enough prints for all, I would still like to be on the list. #63 works for me.
benjoshua wrote:Thanks for clarifying. This is one of the reasons we put up this list. You will be #63. ScketreWhisp will now be buying two extra prints instead of three. The Limited Edition print total will remain at 65.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:I had stated this on one of the very first pages of this now long winded thread (A few others also said as much).I would buy an extra copy also... if need be.But if Doug wants three... then I am fine with that.
mbassoc2003 wrote:What's the quality of the printing ink finish on these? And paper weight? Is it the sort of thing that will rub against itself the way TLG's books fo in their boxes sets? I'm just thinking about damage in transit, rubbing, scuffing of the image etc. And of course you need to think about smudging and brushing of the signature etc. also.
jasonw1239 wrote:I am anticipating that it will cost nearly as much to have the print properly framed as it will be for the purchase and shipping. Mine may have to languish in its shipping container for several months.