Snipers LOSE as often as they WIN by that strategy since Ebay will always resolve any 'proxy bidding' loops it has even if it's at the last second.
deimos3428 wrote:Sniping is fine, in the sense that it doesn't raise the final price, or cheat others out of a fair chance to bid on something. So it's ethical. It's not terribly moral.The problem that I have with sniping is that it is very demotivating for newbie eBayers (like me) to have something "ripped away" in the final minutes/seconds. Often I bid on something, have the high bid for several days, and end up losing because I don't stay up all night watching my auctions close. Snipers LOSE as often as they WIN by that strategy since Ebay will always resolve any 'proxy bidding' loops it has even if it's at the last second. True, so why snipe? It's clearly done so that the original bidder doesn't have a chance to "respond". Place your counter-bid days/hours ahead, as well, and save me the trouble of getting my hopes up...Maybe if eBay only accepted one bid per person per auction...
deimos3428 wrote:Sniping is fine, in the sense that it doesn't raise the final price, or cheat others out of a fair chance to bid on something. So it's ethical. It's not terribly moral.
deimos3428 wrote: The problem that I have with sniping is that it is very demotivating for newbie eBayers (like me) to have something "ripped away" in the final minutes/seconds. Often I bid on something, have the high bid for several days, and end up losing because I don't stay up all night watching my auctions close.
Deimos3428 - I hear sentiments like you mentioned many times. I can not fathom how sniping can be viewed in such a way
Winning an auction is like winning a game - you play within the rules an do what it takes to get the victory.
As far as I'm concerned? If there is something I really want, you had better make sure that your max bid is more than I'm willing to go, because I have a cable internet connection and up 3 browser windows open and ready to go. I can get my bid recorded with 3 sec. to go
deimos3428 wrote:Basically, you're of the opinion that anything that doesn't break the rules is valid. That's an ethical argument, and a correct one. The moral argument is that just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should do something. This is also correct.
Hmm, that is interesting (and I don't mean to get too philosophical), but who is my moral obligation actually to? Is my moral obligation to another potential buyer who I do not even know? Maybe my moral obligation is to the seller - I know that I will pay for the item instantly (this "other" buyer may never pay and thus by "sniping" and I am not only giving the seller more money, but guaranteeing him a sucessful transaction.). My moral obligation could be to eBay - since I want the item, I owe it to them to bid as high as I am honestly willing to pay. My obligation could be to the collecting community - if I win a high grade Amazing Spider-Man, I am confident in my abilities to preserve it in the current condition as long as I own it. Another buyer might be careless and let it get damaged. Just some thoughts on the ambiguous nature of morality.
morgansurname wrote:Think of it another way...has anyone reading this post ever been at a real auction?
morgansurname wrote:Granted, a real auction ends when no one else is willing to up his "snipe"!!!